Monday, 24 May 2010

Bankers - The Root Of All Evil

Michael Moore's new film Capitalism: A Love Story premiered on British television last week. To be fair it did go some way to expose the iniquity, corruption and avarice that has impoverished many Americans, but the criticism of the banksters was tame and ultimately limited to the events surrounding the recent financial crisis in the United States. Moore neglected to inform his viewers how, historically, international bankers have in fact done far worse. I shall attempt to remedy that:

The Rothschilds

The House of Rothschild is an international banking dynasty of German Jewish origin that have used their power and influence to shape history, both for their own interests and for the Zionist cause. Legend has it that it was Nathan Rothschild who ensured the bank's prominence, thanks to his ruthless manipulation of the stock market.

By the early 1800s the Rothschilds had established a very quick and reliable communication network, so that members of the family, who were dispersed across Europe - in Prussia, Vienna, Naples, Paris and London - could relay messages to one another. Indeed it is said the system was so efficient, that it could even communicate news faster than the courier systems employed by Europe's monarchs, and this would prove very profitable indeed.

In 1815, the Battle of Waterloo was to prove fundamental in shaping the continent, as if Wellington could defeat Napoleon, it would ensure the British held the balance of power in Europe. Vast sums of money would be made, or lost, based upon the outcome of the battle, and Nathan Rothschild seeing an opportunity to make a fortune, had observers close by, ready to convey news of the outcome.

So it was that Nathan Rothschild, was the first to hear of Napoleon's defeat, and put his crafty plan in operation. He immediately began to furiously sell British government bonds and other stock, and word soon got round that Wellington had been defeated at Waterloo. The price of bonds soon began to fall, as those who observed Rothschild tried desperately to divest themselves of assets they believed to be next to worthless, before official news arrived. Soon word spread and the price of the bonds tumbled to a small fraction of its value in a matter of hours. This is of course what Rothschild had anticipated, and he swiftly bought the entire market of government bonds for pennies in the pound! Or so the story goes.

The following is a quote attributed to Nathan Rothschild:

"I care not what puppet is placed on
the throne of England to rule the Empire...
The man that controls Britain's money
supply controls the British Empire.
And I control the money supply."

The Secrets of the Federal Reserve; Eustace Mullins, Chapter 5, The House of Rothschild
It seems that some historians, probably most, reject the version of events related above as apocryphal. However, the following was reported in the Independent:


The news that the bankers Rothschild are to withdraw from the gold market, in which they have been a major player for two centuries, has been hailed as the end of an era.

In one sense, of course, it is. This was the company that smuggled gold coins across the English Channel to finance the Duke of Wellington's advance through France to his final triumph at Waterloo over Napoleon (who, it turned out, had also borrowed money from the Rothschilds).

The Rothschild story: A golden era ends for a secretive dynasty; Independent; Paul Vallely; 16th April 2004


The same article continues thus:

But in another way it marks out the continuation of an even older tradition - the ability of the family which has founded one of the world's largest private banking dynasties to sustain their secretive fortune, which industry insiders count not in billions but in trillions, and keep it within the family.

Secrecy has been a hallmark of the Rothschilds from the outset. Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the son of an itinerant money lender and goldsmith who settled in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt-am-Main in 1744, specialised not just in clever accounting practices but also kept secret books and subterranean vaults which he ensured were never the privy of auditor, lawyer or taxman.

(...)

Certainly, for all the family motto of Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Unity, Integrity, Industry), Nathan's ability to depress stock prices by using the network of agents to spread rumours, true or false, and then buy the stock up after people panicked, was legendary.

More significant, however, was that in the process the Rothschilds created the world of banking as we know it today. Nathan operated principally as an underwriter and speculator in the early 19th-century bond market. He and his brothers invented, or at any rate popularised, the government bond, which allowed investors, big and small, to buy bits of the debts of sovereign states by purchasing fixed-interest bearer bonds.


The Rothschilds and the Balfour Declaration
By the early 1900s, the Rothschild's power was awesome. Proof of the family's wealth and influence is manifest from The Balfour Declaration. From The BBC:


The Balfour Declaration

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was the first significant declaration by a world power in favour of a Jewish "national home" in what was known as Palestine.

Historians disagree as to what the then British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour, intended by his declaration. The letter has no mention of the word "state", and insists that nothing should be done "which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine".

The letter was addressed to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the Jewish community in Britain. It became an important arm of the movement to create a Jewish state in Palestine.

The letter:

Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:

His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours,
Arthur James Balfour


Now, given the power of the House of Rothschild, I would suggest The Balfour Declaration was payment for their services. This is of course purely conjecture on my part, but Britain was embroiled in the First World War at the time. Wars, of course, need to be financed, and I imagine in 1917 the British government was desperate for funds which the Rothschilds could supply, alternatively it may be that the Rothschilds and other Zionists used their influence to bring the US into the war. I can think of no other conceivable reason why, in 1917, in the midst of the greatest ever war, our government would have been interested in finding a 'national home for the Jewish people'.

Anthony Sutton

Anthony Sutton was a British born historian, who published some very controversial books, including: Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. As the titles suggest, Sutton believed that Wall Street - or rather bankers - had financed both the Bolshevik Revolution and the Communist regimes that followed, as well as Hitler's Nazi party. The following is from his website:


Antony Sutton has been persecuted but never prosecuted for his research and subsequent publishing of his findings. His mainstream career was shattered by his devotion towards uncovering the truth. In 1968, his Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Sutton showed how the Soviet state's technological and manufacturing base, which was then engaged in supplying the North Vietnamese the armaments and supplies to kill and wound American soldiers, was built by US firms and mostly paid for by the US taxpayers. From their largest steel and iron plant, to automobile manufacturing equipment, to precision ball-bearings and computers, basically the majority of the Soviet's large industrial enterprises had been built with the United States help or technical assistance.

Professor Richard Pipes of Harvard said in his book, Survival Is Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America's Future (Simon & Schuster;1984): "In his three-volume detailed account of Soviet Purchases of Western Equipment and Technology . . . [Antony] Sutton comes to conclusions that are uncomfortable for many businessmen and economists. For this reason his work tends to be either dismissed out of hand as 'extreme' or, more often, simply ignored."

Now, I shall reiterate a passage I quoted earlier:

This was the company that smuggled gold coins across the English Channel to finance the Duke of Wellington's advance through France to his final triumph at Waterloo over Napoleon (who, it turned out, had also borrowed money from the Rothschilds).

As I stated earlier, the above quote came from The Independent, a mainstream newspaper. Of course, the controlled media would never lend credence to Anthony Sutton's findings - The House of Rothschild and their ilk would never allow it. Ask yourself, if such people are able to buy themselves nation states, and engineer wars, who do you think is pushing European integration and mass-immigration?

There were devious intelligences at least a hundred years ago who had already anticipated a state of affairs under which potential power seekers would manipulate the masses by bringing control all organs of the popular press under their own effective control.

The purpose? It had to be some drastic restructuring of society which would be rejected out of hand by free peoples if the issues were fairly and honestly presented.

James Gibb-Stuart, The Hidden Menace


I sincerely believe they are engineering a World State, or as is more commonly known, a New World Order.


21 comments:

Winston the Smithy said...

It is believed that within 2 years of the war starting, Germany's U-boats had pretty much sewn it up for the Germans. Britain and the allied forces were pretty much beaten (they don't tell you this in history). Italy had all but crumbled, Russia was about to go into revolt, again with the Rothschilds very much part of that. France was suffering huge losses and Kaiser William was about to offer peace terms to the allied forces.
However, what then happened changed things. Rothschild and the Zionists got in touch with the British establishment and told them that they'd get America into the war if they promised them Palestine. Of course America was anti war, the people were against it and the American media was whistling the tune for the Germans. The British agreed, not wishing to accept defeat and the Rothschilds and Zionists conspiracy started to change the tune in the USA media, to demonising the Germans as baby eaters and murderers etc. Then of course the Lusitania was sunk, in dangerous waters.

WW1 was the war for the creation of Israel and it was non Jewish lives who paid the ultimate price for it. It's amazing when you consider the history of Israel and their terrorists - the Irgun.

Like I said, it's all lies. Our forefathers died so that Israel could be born. What a waste when they already have their land in Russia and should live there.

Unrepentant British Nationalist said...

Thanks for your reply, Winston. May I ask, have you any sources to substantiate these assertions? I ask, because there is so much conjecture surrounding Zionism and the creation of Israel. I try to deal in facts, and when I have none or they are inconclusive I state that any further conclusions are assumptions, based upon the evidence I have obtained - like where the I stated the Balfour Agreement was in fact payment for the services of Rothschild.

Winston the Smithy said...

UBN,

As I said "believed" but here is an interesting link to what an ex Jew has to say about the situation regarding WW1 & Zionism. Of course because of his views he was labelled as an anti semitic, a Jew hater, which sort of always happens to any Jew who becomes and ex Jew and speaks out about Judaism and Zionism.
Is what he says true? Well, who knows, but one thing I can say is that the Rothschild Empire were also arms dealers supplying both sides of WW1 & 2. More so, why on earth would Britain decide to give Palestine to the Jews? Under what pretext? One can only conclude that it was in payment for services rendered to secure her victory in WW2. And then you can ask yourself, what does Benjamin Freedman have to gain by saying all this? The answer is nothing, but to lose everything.

This is what some Jews and Zionist didn't want you to know 1

Unrepentant British Nationalist said...

Interesting stuff! I hadn't heard of this chap before, and I will endeavour to investigate his speeches and theories.

I will say, however, that the fact he has turned his back on Judaism doesn't necessarily make what he said any more plausible. George Galloway's Respect Party courts Islam and he is a massive exponent of multiculturalism and mass-immigration, for example. There are plenty of indigenous Britons who have turned traitor, and thus I am not surprised that there are Jewish people who are willing to betray their own, too (not that I am suggesting Freedman is betraying his own - he may well be right, and merely satisfying his own conscience).

Due to the diaspora, the Jewish people have tended to develop a mentality whereby they are more cohesive and protective of their own. Looking back throughout history, they have been persecuted - whether due to their own making or not - and have developed a sort of siege mentality, as evidenced by the Community Service Trust and the Anti-Defamation League. We could learn a lot from these people!

Certainly, though I believe that Anthony Sutton's findings may well be correct, and Wall Street had effectively engineered wars. Whether the motives were connected to Zionism, however, is another question. You see, wars need to be financed, plus the destruction they caused needs to be repaired - which also needs to be financed. The bankers can make a lot of money lending to governments, which in turn gives them influence over them...

Whilst I acknowledge that many wealthy bankers are Jewish and/or Zionists, and have used their influence to secure a homeland for their people, I do not believe that all the Wall Street bankers are Zionists (eg. JP Morgan and the Rockefellers - though the latter is a matter of contention).

Whilst Jewish people have an inordinate amount of influence in certain fields (look at the number of nobel prize winners are Jewish), I do not believe that what is happening is down to "the Jews"...not that I am suggesting you do. Kevin MacDonald has written some interesting books on the subject.

Winston the Smithy said...

Winston the Smithy said...

The comment below was originally posted by Winston the Smithy. Unfortunately I believe it may have transgressed certain anti-free speech legislation, and thus I have edited it. No profanity, threats or language promoting violence was posted. Please accept my apologies, Winston, but I believe this was in both of our interests:

Well.....
Galloway for example simply dances for the highest bidder and East London's Bethnal Green and Bow was a prime target for him to attract support amongst the Muslim community there. And that seems to be the ONLY community there as it's like Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Regarding Jews I can't say if they're 100% behind the problems in society or they're not, but they certainly play and have played a massive part in just what's been going on. [Edited]

I'm certainly not going to say ALL Jews as there are those who just get on with their day to day lives, but come on, for the size of the Jewish population and the wealth and power they attain, truly means that something's going on there behind the scenes. The art world is literally loaded with them as is the media which they very much control. Through arts, entertainment and media, they have managed to [manipulate society]. And yes, I agree because of history they have developed a siege mentality and see themselves as victims, when in reality they've all been booted out of their many lands [because of their perceived financial unscrupulousness]. We talk of Muslims who segregate, what about them? The automatic response is that "Jews aren't terrorists like Muslims." I at first believed this until I educated myself. [Edited].

It's ironic to see that the Milliband brothers are racing to become leaders of Nulabour isn't it?

Anyway, to cut a long story short, there are many factors at play within the New World Order, but overwhelmingly the brainchild is a Rothschild, a Khazarian Jew whose family has reaped untold damage and mysery on the west (and world) all in the pursuit for global supermacy and overwhelming wealth and power. Were I a Jew and knew this, I'd be doing my best to destroy this. But then, when you start going back to the bible and what it has to say about the Jews, they have a rough time in there as well. As I said, many great people have written much on the Jews. This needs to be investigated and understood so that the western people [know the truth]. Even as we speak, Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons that would quite happily attack the west if it felt Israel was threatened. I've been totally ignorant on Zionism and Judaism, to the extent that I had no idea of history, or should I say the "untold" history. And again, the Islamic growth in the west is very much a ploy by Zionists to create hatred against Islam. It's plain for all to see.

Unrepentant British Nationalist said...

Winston,

I have saved your original comment, and if you like you can post it on your own blog and link to it from here, though I'd advise against it.

Please accept my apologies for censoring what you wrote, but I believe it potentially could have landed us both in hot water.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zjUwwkM64U

Anonymous said...

Read this;

http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/yoke.html

Anonymous said...

Rothschild =redshield= red flag=communism. The illumanati infiltrated free masonry brother marx lenin and bronstein

Anonymous said...

Late Victor rothschild was (the fifth man) in cambridge spy ring. Handy when you family were controling ussr money supply

Anonymous said...

Economics is a double edge sword and can be used against the nwo. We need nationalist banks building societies

Anonymous said...

It is time to understand the fractional banking system and use on line nationalist banking using our northern eurnpean bretheren

Anonymous said...

Organise and take back the money supply. To beat an octopus cut off it tentacles and then it will starve to death

Anonymous said...

They will retaliate with taxation . But offshore loop holes are a double edge sword too . They will spite themselves by closing them

Anonymous said...

Each iou and gentlemens agreement is power taken back. Nationalist banks =nationalist housing =nationalist votes

Anonymous said...

Banking is used to shape societies .by controling money supply to their favoured projects

Anonymous said...

We are the majority and are strong and the nwo is very weak. Like a bullfrog they inflate their chest to frighten . But they can be beaten

Anonymous said...

If they were strong they would not need to conspire in secret. We must tar them with the same brush and ridicule them

Anonymous said...

Why northern irish has a rothschild star on it . Because rothschild lost the trade from the dublin port and boycotts eire

Anonymous said...

De valera uses irish brotherhood and diaspora in usa to set up irish bank. signs book of condolense for hitler to spite rothschild

Anonymous said...

Last year eire forms national assets management agency(nama) and put n.m.rothschild in charge