"The whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see."
Another week has gone by, and as usual there are several stories which relate how the insidious destruction of Britain is ongoing, and any opposition to it is 'racist', 'vicious' and 'nasty'.
'Spot The White Man' FilmThe following story appeared in yesterday's Daily Star:
FURY OVER BNP 'SPOT THE WHITE MAN' FILM
7th November 2009
By Emma Wall
A RACE row erupted last night over a BNP-backed political film that shows a British borough without a white person in sight.
The film sees a cameraman walk the streets of the Del Boy territ-ory of Peckham, south London.
He passes hundred of shoppers, workers and other people, but every one of them is black, Asian or from other ethnic communities.
The 10-minute clip urges people to vote for the far right BNP, claiming the area is a “multicultural hellhole”.
Racist messages pop up on the film, which has been posted on YouTube, including: “Spot the white man – immigration invasion.”
Having seen the film I can assert that the above report is fairly accurate, though I'd dispute the use of the adjective 'racist'. The film lasts for nearly ten minutes and is of a pedestrian filming a Peckham high street. As the report describes, of the hundreds of people captured in the footage virtually none are white. The comments mentioned are fairly benign, and either refer to the shocking reality, that the British people have been displaced from the area, or are satirical in nature. No racial slurs are used. Bearing this in mind, the article concludes thus:
Anti-fascist groups last night demanded it be removed from the website as it was branded one of the nastiest party political messages of all time. Unite Against Fascism called for a ban on the “horrible racist video”.
Joint secretary Weyman Bennett raged: “This is proof, if anybody needed it, that the BNP are lying when they say they are not racist.
“The BNP are always trying to incite racism. This video pours hatred against black people and Asians.”
The film’s vicious commentary asks: “Ever felt like a foreigner in your own country?”
A speech bubble has an Asian man saying: “Please don’t film me – I’m illegal and I’m working for cash in hand, innit.”
The party denied the clip is an official BNP film but deputy leader Simon Darby said: “It’s a hard-hitting, topical thing that people will find funny. We are linking to it on our website.”
The suggestions that the film 'pours hatred against black people and Asians', or that it is 'one of the nastiest party political messages of all time' are obscenely hysterical. I imagine most Daily Star readers will see them as such, too.
Their hysteria is not surprising, though, as there is no mesage more powerful for the BNP than exposing the stark reality of what mass-immigration is doing to our country. Many people who have not visited such areas of our major cities will be stunned and appalled, and that scares Weyman Bennett, et al, hence their desperate, pathetic plea to have the truth censored.
Sadly, this is Socially Marxist Britain and YouTube has adhered to their request. At the time of writing, however, video has reappeared here.
When Saying Black Is Black Is WrongMeanwhile, whilst the indigenous people are apparently wrong to feel aggrieved about being dispossessed of their country...
A student and his girlfriend are furious after being called a 'black couple' on their receipt by staff at a pub.
Johnson Abraham, 24, and Roxanne Duhur, 21, claim they were the only couple dining when they received their bill at the Slug And Lettuce in Islington Green, North London.
(...)
When they went to pay for the meal the comment 'upstairs blk couple' was printed on the bill.
Mr Abraham said: 'I was outraged. They wouldn't have written "white couple".
'They could have found another way to describe us. I don't feel it's appropriate.
Pub apologises after calling couple 'black' on their bill - when they were the only customers dining; Dail Mail; 3rd November 2009
Above: the offending receipt.
Above: Mr Abraham and Ms Duhur at the crime scene.Hat Tip:
DowlishCould it be that black people consider it offensive to be reminded they're black because they feel inferior and that their people have achieved nothing of merit in terms of culture, literature or technology? It certainly seems that way much of the time.
Unless of course it is politically expedient to cast yourself as black eg. the 'black' president who happens to be half-white and was brought up by his white family.
Of course the reality is that the couple imagined they'd get some compensation for their 'humiliation' and they were aided and abbetted by a media controlled by people who desire a mulitcultural and racially plural Britain. The object is to cow and silence white people by ensuring that any reference to the ethnicity of a racial minority is tabboo.
BNP Making Ground In GlasgowFrom today's Independent:
Senior politicians from all the main parties have conceded that the BNP could make the significant advance of saving its deposit in the Glasgow North East by-election, on Thursday.
However, Labour Party officials campaigning in the constituency warned yesterday that the BNP could even come third, as part of a "protest vote" against the number of asylum-seekers living in the area.
Although Scotland has not had a significant problem with issues of race and immigration in the past, Glasgow North East has one of the highest percentages of asylum-seekers in the country. The BNP has targeted the asylum issue with a campaign pledge to end "mass immigration".
BNP set to advance in ex-Speaker Martin's Glasgow seat; The Independent On Sunday; Sunday, 8 November 2009
The Scotsman On Sunday is also reporting on the BNP's election campaign:
There is enough anecdotal evidence from the constituency to suggest the BNP's message of intolerance, ignorance and fear has found a ready echo among a minority of Glasgow voters. Friends of mine who have spent time in the constituency in recent weeks – some as journalists, some as canvassers – have been taken aback at the nakedly racist comments they have heard in the streets and on the doorsteps.
Wow! I'm shocked! You'd think, listening to our ruling elite, that these people would be overjoyed with the 'enrichment' their area has received, and the SNP and Labour candidates would be campaigning on a policy of further enriching their area. But it seems the reality is quite different - maybe they saw the Peckham footage! The author's nauseating pro-multicultural spiel contiues thus:
Those of us who adhere to a noble concept of Scotland as "a mongrel nation", inclusive and welcoming, where regardless of colour or creed or sexual preference we're all Jock Tamson's bairns, are sometimes too easily lulled into believing this is a truth. It isn't. It's an aspiration requiring a constant process of persuasion against deep prejudice. The mistake too often made by well-meaning people – those in charge of housing asylum seekers in Glasgow, to use one pertinent example – is that everyone shares this feeling of generosity and munificence. Many do. Many don't. This shouldn't be a surprise.
Scotland On Sunday; Kenny Farquharson: No room for complacency
But what of those who don't? I wonder if the article's author, like Andrew Marr, believes the answer to be 'the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress'?
I very much doubt the author lives on an impoverished housing scheme along with hindreds of Third World refugees who, attracted by our lucrative benefit system, have most likely travelled through many safe countries to get here. 'Asylum seekers' who can't speak the language, who due to their rampant breeding habits are prioritised for social housing, and who receive many other perks including free bus travel. The author probably doesn't understand the pressure that a large influx of such parasitical people put on local resources like schools and health centres, yet he'll still smugly comment on the attitudes of those afflicted from the comfort of his home, which knowing Scotland I imagine is somewhere comfortably middle-class and ethnically homogenous.
Of course there is inevitably a vitriolic attack on the BNP and those who symapthise with them:I've no truck with the commentators who argue that BNP supporters are just ordinary decent people who have simply become disillusioned with the political process, as if this somehow explained or even excused their behaviour. Nonsense. They're bigots and racists, and no amount of disconnect with mainstream politics can justify or excuse their hateful white supremacist tosh.
I wonder how much longer the media can deceive the people? As I have
previously stated there are a lot of people who will always abide by the acceptable parameters of the zeitgeist. Anything tabboo they will shun, and thus the threat of being labelled 'a racist' makes them quake with fear. It reminds me of the character Parsons from Orwell's 1984:
'What are you in for?' said Winston.
'Thoughtcrime!' said Parsons, almost blubbering. The tone of his voice implied at once a complete admission of his guilt and a sort of incredulous horror that such a word could be applied to himself.
Farquharson's sanctimonious drivel continues here.
